Skip to main content

Pentax A 28-80 f3.5 - 4.5 lens on Sony a6500

I'm continuing to search for a half decent walk around lens for my Sony a6500, having tried and discarded the Zeiss and Sony offerings. My latest discovery is a Pentax A 28-80 f3.5-4.5 zoom from the film era. I've had my copy for years, bought second hand it's not in the best of condition, with marks visible on the front element and a general slackness in the zoom helicoid. This is what it looks like on the camera.

Be warned, this is a manual focus lens, if that's not your cup of tea, read no further!


It's no lightweight being of mixed metal and plastic construction. With adapter it weighs 502 g, but this is appreciably lighter than the Tamron 28-80 that I have also tested.

How does it perform, I've not conducted any brick wall tripod tests as yet, but having taken a number of shots with it I am reasonably impressed. 

Here's an example. It was a muggy, hazy day with poor visibility, but the image quality is OK

First of all the overall view, the German cruise ship Mein Schiff 3 moored at North Shields terminal. 

(Click any image for a larger view)


Now actual pixel crops from the extreme left and right of the image



The edges are far better than either the modern Zeiss or Sony zoom achieved, but the overall image lacks a bit of contrast. I really do need to do some formal testing on a bright sunny day.

I need to compare this lens with the Tamron 28-80 that I have also tested, and with some of my old film camera primes.

Sadly, further shooting has revealed a fatal flaw with this lens, at closer distances and probably due to the ravages of age, it does not always achieve sharp focus in the centre of the field. Take a look at this image of some ironstone rocks and the actual pixel crops from centre, left and right.


The overall picture


Centre crop


Left crop


Right crop

The camera was focused on the centre point, so this should not be a field curvature issue. Further I have more examples showing the same pattern. Maybe the wobbly focusing ring is the culprit? This particular copy of the lens is unusable, but I would like to get a hold of another example as, surely, this can't be a generic fault!

I've since carried out a tripod and wall test. Out of 15 images only one displays this fault, taken at 35mm and f8. Two other shots at that focal length and aperture do not. 

Edit 28-8-19 - blurred centre!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sony 28-70 FF lens on a6500

Since my kit 16-50 lens failed and was pronounced unrepairable I've been looking for a replacement walk around zoom, or, in my case, a lightweight lens that I can carry when cycling. I tried the Zeiss 16-70, but as my previous post here demonstrated, that lens was fatally flawed - as well as being expensive. I was persuaded to try the much cheaper 28-70 lens (cost £234 new) that is supplied as part of the standard kit on Sony full frame cameras. Let's give it its full title, the  Sony SEL2870 E Mount - Full Frame 28-70 mm F3.5-5.6 There are things to admire about this lens. It's compact and lightweight and handles well on the a6500. Despite being of plastic construction, it does appear well made, with a metal mount and a robust feel to it. I liked using it. Mounted on a tripod and shooting test pictures against a brick wall the lens is OK, nothing like as sharp at the edges as in the centre, but usable. Here are a few crops from a test shot at 28 mm and f8.  The upper...
4 comments
Read more

Enhancing skies in Photoshop

Most outdoor photos can be improved by doing a bit of work on the sky. I don't know why it is, but skies out of camera look insipid, particularly if, like me, you shoot raw files. In most cases a levels adjustment will perk up the sky. In order to do this you need to select the sky for the adjustment. There are various ways of doing this, for example you can use the quick select tool and maybe apply a feathering of the edge. (Select, Refine). However if there are hard edges present, e.g. the built environment, this might not be appropriate. You might then consider using more precise selection methods, for example the Polygonal selection tool or the Pen. Both of these tools require skill, time and patience. Quote often there are both soft and hard edges, when quick select accompanied by a more accurate method can be employed. In that instance it might be necessary to feather the soft edges by painting on or erasing from the layer mask [2], e.g. where there are trees etc. There...
Post a Comment
Read more

Minolta Rokkor Enlarger lens on Sony a6500

I've been experimenting with my old enlarger lenses as a means of scanning old negatives and slides, but, out of curiosity, decided to see if they could be used as prime lenses for distance work on the Sony a6500. The lens in question is a Minolta Rokkor 75 mm f4.5. In order to do this you need to buy a focusing helicoid as enlarger lenses relied upon a bellows or helicoid within the enlarger to focus the negatives. You also need an M39 to M42 adapter as enlarger lenses came with the old Leica thread that is, nowadays, non standard. Finally an M42 to Sony E fit adapter completes the kit. Enough of the cackle, how does it do? Very well actually, here's a view from the rear of our house and an actual pixels crop from the extreme left of the frame. Click for larger images. The image is sharp to the edge of the frame with no sign of any CA - possibly helped by the fact that I have CA removal permanently engaged in Lightroom! It's an unfair comparison I k...
Post a Comment
Read more